Official Endorsement Page
Statewide Race Endorsements:
After careful review, Sound Off Louisiana makes the following endorsements, which are also easily viewable by clicking here (highlighted candidate endorsed). Note: If you do not know your House or Senate District, CLICK HERE.
The negative attack ads by Rispone against Abraham (after committing on numerous occasions not to engage in such activity) have rendered Rispone unelectable against Edwards. While we would certainly support Rispone in a runoff, the same cannot be said by many North Louisiana Republicans who have a strong affinity for Abraham and who are justifiably deeply offended by #1) the attack ads themselves, and #2) the despicable action of duplicating Gumbo PAC ads entailing charitable contributions on the part of Congressman Abraham. The facts that a well-respected, conservative Representative like Alan Seabaugh (R-Shreveport) flipped from Rispone to Abraham as a result of the ads and popular conservative talk show host Moon Griffon, who had been neutral, spent 23 minutes lambasting Rispone over the move, we believe reinforce our notion.
Nunguesser cautions against overconfidence, but he should win this one by a pretty large margin.
Secretary of State:
The power of incumbency and experience should cause Ardoin to cruise in this one.
While we would have preferred Landry pursue additional corruption (some of which we submitted to his office), he certainly battled Edwards' attempts to cram convicted felon Larry Bankston down voters' throats, and he consistently challenged Edwards' executive orders in court and prevailed.
Commissioner of Agriculture:
Yes, Greer is a Democrat. He has also effectively made the case that Strain has been nonresponsive to farmers who have repeatedly sought his office's assistance. Strain also heavily fought a bill to eliminate the need to have a license to be a florist. For that reason, Strain is a non-starter for us! It's that simple! Regarding Zaunbrecher, he readily admits he has no intention of winning this race and is merely attempting to establish name recognition for a 2023 run.
Commissioner of Insurance:
Both candidates have severe drawbacks; however, for Temple to slam previous Commissioners while simultaneously utilizing one of them (Wooley) in his effort to win is absolutely beyond the pale. It's indicative of someone who wants to have his cake and eat it too, and that titled the scale for us in endorsing Donelon.
Do you support an amendment to exempt raw materials, goods, commodities, personal property, and other articles stored in public and private warehouses and destined for the Outer Continental Shelf from ad valorem taxes? (December 1, 2019) (Amends Article VII, Section 21(D)(2) and (3))
YES. This was an overreach by coastal parishes' assessors that is almost certain to be challenged as a violation of the U. S. Constitution. In our opinion, the plaintiffs will prevail in that litigation, and we taxpayers will once again be stuck with massive legal fees defending litigation which could have been avoided by voters pre-empting a court battle and exempting the items from this overly-aggressive action by coastal parish assessors.
Do you support an amendment to provide for appropriations from the Education Excellence Fund for the Louisiana Educational Television Authority, Thrive Academy, and laboratory schools operated by public postsecondary education institutions? (Amends Article VII, Section 10.8(C)(3)(b), (c), and (g); Repeals Article VII, Section 10.8(C)(3)(d))
NO. While the legislation is purported to "correct an oversight" entailing three (3) schools (Thrive, University Lab, and Southern University Lab) and only entails $75,000/year each and the average per pupil amount the fund pays to paid to other public schools, these schools already have substantial MFP funding and tuition which are already aided by Louisiana State taxpayer subsidies.
Do you support an amendment to protect taxpayers by requiring a complete remedy in law for the prompt recovery of any unconstitutional tax paid and to allow the jurisdiction of the Board of Tax Appeals to extend to matters related to the constitutionality of taxes? (Adds Article V, Section 35)
Not just NO, but HELL NO! Given the rampant corruption we have seen by various boards and commissions with members appointed by the Governor, the last thing we want is yet another boy of political hacks deciding the constitutionality of taxes. We think it's better to challenge the taxes in court and hope for an informed judge to make the ruling (which can then be appealed). In all likelihood, the first time someone appearing before this Board doesn't like the ruling, the Board members' ruling on the constitutionality of taxes imposed (which would likely be heavily influenced by philosophical viewpoints of the sitting Governor) would be challenged in the courts anyway. This measure would thus merely added yet another layer of legal expenses incurred. Even if the plaintiff is happy with the ruling of the Board, that happiness may likely result from connections rather than a proper interpretation of Louisiana's Constitution anyway. We've seen way, way too much cronyism on appointed boards and commissions in Louisiana to go along with this amendment!
Do you support an amendment to allow the City of New Orleans to exempt property within Orleans Parish from all or part of ad valorem taxes that would otherwise be due for the purpose of promoting affordable housing? (Adds Article VII, Section 21(O))
NO. There are already too many subsidies both on the Federal and State level for "affordable housing," and this proposal has waste and abuse stamped on its forehead!
DISTRICT 5 (Shreveport area):
See our commentary regarding Seabaugh's quest to be the next Speaker of the House.
DISTRICT 39 (Carencro area):
Emerson is a true champion for occupational licensing reform and voted "no" on every single occasion entailing the sales tax renewal of 2018!
DISTRICT 46 (St. Martinville area):
Baudin is about the only candidate (Bob Bell for Senate District 16 being the other) willing to publicly state on camera that he will NOT vote for ANY tax increase. As evidenced by the prior link, Huval has voted for many and has a disastrous voting record when it comes to occupational licensing reform.
DISTRICT 48 (New Iberia area):
Gonsolin has been one of the most effective interviewees we've listened to on the Moon Griffon show in a LONG time. He demonstrates a genuine grasp of Louisiana's dire need of tort reform and other important measures vital toward improving Louisiana's languishing economy.
DISTRICT 51 (Houma area):
Amedee consistently voted against the sales tax renewals every single time in 2018.
DISTRICT 66 (Baton Rouge area):
Edmonds, along with Seabaugh and Miguez (unopposed), can be counted upon to always consistently oppose tax increases!
DISTRICT 71 (Denham Springs / Livingston area):
Davis is a young, energetic, conservative Republican whom we believe will represent his district well in the House.
DISTRICT 77 (Mandeville area):
Wright voted "no" every single time entailing the 2018 sales tax renewals.
DISTRICT 95 (Albany/Springfield area):
Mack also voted "no" every single time entailing the 2018 sales tax renewals. While we support his re-election, we staunchly oppose his efforts to be the next Speaker of the House.
DISTRICT 9 (Metairie area):
Henry voted "no" every single time on the 2018 sales tax renewals. He'll be replacing conservative Senator Conrad Appel.
DISTRICT 10 (Kenner area):
Hugely-important race! Talbot strongly support tort reform, whereas Bohannan is the trial-lawyer candidate. Talbot will be a sea change vs. the present senator to occupy that seat, Dan Martiny.
DISTRICT 11 (Mandeville area):
Falconer consistently voted against the 2018 sales tax renewals and will be a strong conservative voice in the Louisiana Senate.
DISTRICT 12 (Franklington area):
Solid conservative voice in the Senate. She should have no trouble whatsoever in her re-election efforts.
DISTRICT 13 (Livingston area):
Critical race that Carlin needs to prevail if the seat is to be solidly conservative!
DISTRICT 16 (Baton Rouge area):
The fact that Bell is a huge underdog matters not to us. He has been commit on camera that he will not support any tax increase! If the runoff ends up being Carter and Foil, we will make no endorsement thereof as both have hugely disappointing voting records from our perspective!
DISTRICT 25 (Jennings area):
This is the easiest race of all to analyze! Berken has repeatedly stressed on Moon Griffon's show his desire for tort reform and other business-friendly initiatives and his opposition to tax increases. In sharp contrast, Mark "Mo taxes" Abraham has consistently voted for more taxes than we can count. Guinn voted for so many taxes that he was inducted into American's For Prosperity's "Taker's Dozen." As we have emphasized, he is also strongly supportive of the illegal practice of shill bidding to take from public auction bidders. Also, Guinn has quite the reputation at the State Capitol, and suffice to say it's not a flattering one. Is it any wonder that, in 12 years at a House member (thank God he's term-limited out), no Speaker ever felt comfortable awarding him a committee chairmanship?
DISTRICT 28 (Ville Platte area):
Attorney General Jeff Landry has called this "the most important Legislative race in this election cycle," and we concur. Both Johnson and LeBas would not even remotely be reflective of a fiscal conservative's interests, and they both have voting records to demonstrate their love affair with taxation of the people they represent.
DISTRICT 36 (Bossier City area):
Gatti may as well be John Bel Edwards' clone and, God knows, it's bad enough having to deal with one John Bel Edwards! Having a second one serving in the State Senate masquerading around as a Republican is frustrating beyond words!